Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
10
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Mini unveils its first hybrid vehicle[2016/11/17]
-
On the sleepy Hawaiian island of Kauai sits a first of its kind solar and battery project.[2016/11/18]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]