Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
The idea of a national ripple effect didn’t seem to much concern Phil Rozenski, policy chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance.[2016/11/14]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Ron Paul Issues Surprising Warning About Gold[2016/11/08]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]